| Year | City | Country | Continent/World Region |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1994 | Lillehammer | Norway | Europe |
| 1996 | Atlanta | United States | North America |
| 1998 | Nagano | Japan | Asia |
| 2000 | Sydney | Australia | Oceania |
| 2002 | Salt Lake City | United States | North America |
| 2004 | Athens | Greece | Europe |
| 2006 | Turin | Italy | Europe |
| 2008 | Beijing | People's Republic of China | Asia |
| 2010 | Vancouver | Canada | North America |
| 2012 | London | United Kingdom | Europe |
| 2014 | Sochi | Russia | Europe |
Now, having the Games in Chicago would be nice and all, but I really think it'd be much fairer to give the games to Rio. Both the United States and Japan have each hosted the Games at least once since 1994 (Atlanta '96, Nagano '98, Salt Lake City '02). Spain hasn't hosted since 1992, just earlier than the list was cut off, when the Summer Games were held in 2016. Now, I can see the argument for each country that they deserve the Games again, as the most recent for any candidate nation is Salt Lake City's 2002 Games. However, Brazil has never hosted an Olympic Games. Not only that, but no South American city has every hosted the Games. Geographically, Rio deserves the Games outright. I realize that there are more factors going into the final decision, but I think it would be a win for everyone in Brazil and South America if Rio were to host the 2016 Summer Olympics.
Just as a side note, I don't think Rio will win. Based on their evaluation ratings, I would say that the most likely winners would be Madrid or Tokyo. My prediction is Tokyo. The winner will be announced on 2 October 2009 in Copenhagen, Denmark. Look for a blog post then.
Comment below or send me an e-mail at jay@jayhutchinson.com. Follow me on twitter at twitter.jayhutchinson.com
0 comments:
Post a Comment